Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported e-bikes cleared in CKD condition and assessed as complete e-bikes were entitled to refund of additional customs duty under the exemption notification after subsequent sale on payment of VAT.
Analysis: The goods were assessed at the time of import as e-bikes and not as parts of e-bikes. Once the customs authorities treated the goods as complete e-bikes for assessment and levy under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the Revenue could not re-characterise them as parts for the purpose of denying refund under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The reliance placed on the Board Circular and on Chapter Note 6 of Section XVII did not assist the Revenue, since the admitted position remained that the imported goods were cleared and assessed as e-bikes, later assembled and sold as e-bikes on payment of VAT.
Conclusion: The refund claim was admissible and the Revenue's objection failed.