Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in respect of duty demand and penalty arising from denial of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. on the ground that the exported goods were not handicraft wooden furniture.
Analysis: The appellant had produced an EPCH certificate permitting import of inputs duty-free for the manufacture of goods ultimately exported. At the stay stage, the Revenue sought to dispute the correctness of that certificate and to deny the notification benefit on the footing that the exported furniture was only simple wooden furniture. The Tribunal held that, prima facie, once the certificate was produced, the Revenue could not question its correctness for the purpose of denying the exemption and requiring pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit, and the stay petition was allowed.