Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning alleged incorrect availment of exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-Central Excise.
Analysis: The appellants had availed the exemption for textile and textile articles and it was recorded that, after opting for the notification, no Cenvat credit had been taken on the inputs used for the exempted clearances. In that situation, the demand raised for non-compliance of the notification conditions was found to be misconceived at the interim stage. The earlier view taken in a similar matter was also considered applicable.
Conclusion: The appellants established a strong prima facie case and were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.