We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Court sets aside order under Income Tax Act, grants fresh hearing opportunity The Court set aside the order issued under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, directing the assessee to respond to the proposed transfer within two ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court sets aside order under Income Tax Act, grants fresh hearing opportunity
The Court set aside the order issued under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, directing the assessee to respond to the proposed transfer within two weeks and appear before the Commissioner of Income Tax at Allahabad. The Competent Authority was to decide all issues afresh after providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The petition was allowed with no costs imposed on any party.
Issues: Challenge to legality of order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard and recording reasons.
Analysis: The petitioner contested the legality of an order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner received a copy of the order on 3 January 2014, which was passed without providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard or recording any reasons for the transfer of the case. The Supreme Court and a Division Bench of the Court have established principles requiring a reasonable opportunity of being heard and recording reasons for such transfers. In this case, the impugned order lacked both these essential elements.
Analysis: The Revenue's counsel argued that reasons for the transfer were recorded in letters from the CIT (Central) Kanpur and DIR (Investigation) Kanpur, citing a judgment from the Kerala High Court. The counsel contended that centralization of cases was necessary due to a search operation. However, the Court declined to comment on the centralization issue's merits, emphasizing that the procedure under Section 127(2) must be followed. It was noted that the order lacked the necessary spelled-out reasons, as mandated by the Act.
Analysis: In line with established legal principles, the Court set aside the order dated 17 December 2012 issued under Section 127(2) of the Act. The Court directed the assessee to respond to the proposed transfer within two weeks and appear before the Commissioner of Income Tax at Allahabad. All issues were to be decided by the Competent Authority, and a fresh order was to be issued after providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The petition was allowed as indicated, with no costs imposed on any party.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.