Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's reduction of redemption fine and setting aside of penalty under Section 112A of the Customs Act, 1962 required interference and remand for fresh examination of whether the consignments were stray imports warranting concession.
Analysis: The Court recorded the respondents' concession that the question whether the consignments were stray imports deserving leniency in fine and penalty should be examined afresh. In view of that concession, the existing orders of the Tribunal were set aside and the matters were remitted so that the Tribunal could reconsider the appeals on the nature of the consignments and the appropriateness of the concessions granted.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's orders were set aside and the appeals were remanded to it for fresh decision on the question of concession in redemption fine and penalty.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the fine and penalty issue on a fresh evaluation of whether the consignments were stray imports.