Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. despite delay in furnishing the End Use/Consumption Certificate.
Analysis: The imported goods were covered by the exemption notification subject to production of an End Use/Consumption Certificate from the jurisdictional Central Excise authority within the prescribed period. The certificate was produced, though with a delay of about three months. Condition 20 of the notification permitted such delay. Once the certificate was filed, denial of exemption was not justified.
Conclusion: The importer was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and the demand of differential duty could not be sustained.