Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned circular could control the assessment of units claiming exemption under Section 4-A on expansion, diversification and modernisation, and whether base production for the purpose of exemption included stock transfer and consignment transactions.
Analysis: The Full Bench had already answered the reference by holding that, under the applicable notification, an expanded unit is entitled to exemption on the quantity in excess of base production and that base production includes the quantity relatable to stock transfer and consignment transactions. The writ court, following that binding exposition of law, held that the assessment and allied proceedings had to be decided accordingly and that the contrary view reflected in the circular dated 25.1.2003 could not be followed.
Conclusion: The circular was not to be followed, and the petitioner's proceedings were to be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Full Bench; the writ petition was allowed.