Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a proper construction of the second proviso to section 244(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, interest on refund is payable after excluding only the one-month period from the date of the appellate or other order, and whether the Tribunal was right in holding that no referable question of law arose.
Analysis: The provision was read as an independent enabling provision granting interest on refunds from the date of payment of tax, with only a one-month period excluded by the second proviso. A comparison with section 244(1) showed that Parliament used different language for the two situations, and the later provision indicated an intention to confer interest except for the specified one-month period. The Court also noted that, even if two views were possible, the construction favourable to the taxpayer had to be adopted. The departmental circular was consistent with that reading.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's construction of section 244(1A) was correct, and the Revenue was not entitled to a reference on the question proposed.