TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Chit fund loss not deductible for firm under section 80P(2)(a)(i)</h1> <h3>Soda Silicate And Chemical Works Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> Soda Silicate And Chemical Works Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax - [1989] 179 ITR 588, 46 TAXMANN 33 Issues involved: Determination of deductibility of loss incurred in a chit fund u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) for the assessment year 1980-81.Summary:The High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed the issue of deductibility of a loss incurred in a chit fund by an assessee firm. The assessee, engaged in the manufacture and sale of soda silicate, joined a chit fund and claimed a deduction for the loss of Rs. 14,398 in the chit account. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that contributing to chit funds was not part of the assessee's business. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the deduction, emphasizing that the loan from the chit fund was invested in the business. The Tribunal upheld the Income-tax Officer's decision, stating that chit fund contributions were not revenue expenditure. The court was tasked with determining whether the Tribunal was correct in disallowing the loss claim.In analyzing the nature of the chit fund transactions, the court emphasized the concept of mutuality, where contributors and participants share a common identity. Referring to legal precedents, the court highlighted that a chit fund primarily serves as a loan advancement scheme, and surplus income is not taxable to prevent profiting from oneself. The court differentiated cases where investments were directly linked to business activities, emphasizing the distinct nature of the present case involving chit fund contributions.The court dismissed the contention that the nature of a chit fund was not explicitly raised in the question referred, asserting that it was fundamental to the issue at hand. Ultimately, the court concluded that the chit fund transactions did not generate assessable income or revenue loss eligible for deduction. Consequently, the question was answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs awarded.
TaxTMI 