Appellant Liable for Full Duty Amount under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the appellant was liable to pay the entire duty amount of Rs. 34,83,870 for the month of July 2006 ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant Liable for Full Duty Amount under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules
The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the appellant was liable to pay the entire duty amount of Rs. 34,83,870 for the month of July 2006 under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008. The appellant's addition of two new packing machines during the month meant that the total number of machines working on any day was considered to be working for the entire month, leading to the duty liability for the entire month. The appellant was directed to deposit the full duty amount within 12 weeks, with a compliance verification scheduled for June 7, 2013.
Issues: Duty liability under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008 for addition of packing machines in the factory during a particular month.
Analysis: 1. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing pan masala and gutkha, was discharging duty liability under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008. They had two types of packing machines with different MRPs installed in their factory.
2. The appellant discontinued the use of machines manufacturing gutkha with an MRP of Rs. 2 in June 2006 but later re-started the discontinued machine and added two new machines of MRP Rs. 2 in July 2006, paying duty on a proportionate basis from 10th July 2006.
3. The Revenue contended that since the maximum number of machines working in the factory in July 2006 was 5, the duty liability for the entire month had to be discharged as per Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008.
4. Rule 8 states that in case of addition or installation of a packing machine in the factory during the month, the number of operating packing machines for the month shall be taken as the maximum number of packing machines installed on any day during the month.
5. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had indeed installed two new packing machines in July 2006. Therefore, as per Rule 8, the total number of machines working on any particular day was considered to be working for the entire month, making the duty for the entire month payable by the appellant.
6. The Tribunal found no prima facie case in favor of the appellant as they had not pleaded any financial hardship. Consequently, the appellant was directed to deposit the entire duty amount of Rs. 34,83,870 within 12 weeks from the date of the order.
7. The matter was scheduled to come up for compliance verification on 7th June 2013, and subject to the deposit of the duty amount, the appeal itself would be heard for final disposal on the same date.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
