Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported processed natural limestone was correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 6802 29 00 and, on that basis, entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 103/2009 under the EPCG scheme.
Analysis: The adjudicating authority had itself classified the goods under Customs Tariff Heading 6802 29 00, and that classification was not in dispute before the Tribunal. On the materials placed, the goods were held to be classifiable under the same heading under the ITC (HS) Policy. Once that classification was accepted, the denial of the exemption benefit could not be sustained. The Tribunal also accepted the appellant's contention that the reliance on the withdrawn entry was untenable in the context of the import.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 6802 29 00 and the appellant was held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 103/2009 under the EPCG scheme. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.