Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000 was recoverable on MODVAT credit wrongfully availed on high speed diesel oil without waiting for separate adjudication or the procedure under Rule 57(I) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The credit on high speed diesel oil had already been withdrawn by prior notifications, and assessees nevertheless continued to avail it. Section 112 was treated as a validating and declaratory measure to secure refund of credit wrongly taken during the relevant period and to impose interest if the amount was not returned within thirty days from the President's assent. The provision was read in the background of the earlier notifications and not as creating a fresh retrospective burden. Since the credit had been impermissibly availed, the Revenue was entitled to recover the amount with interest, and the absence of a fresh adjudication did not defeat the statutory recovery.
Conclusion: Interest was recoverable under Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000 on the wrongly availed MODVAT credit, and the Revenue's demand was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the High Court's view was set aside, leaving the Revenue entitled to recover the wrongly availed credit along with interest.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute validly declares that a credit was never admissible and provides for recovery with interest upon non-payment within a stipulated period, the interest becomes recoverable on the wrongful availment itself and is not dependent on a separate adjudication of liability.