Notification-based service tax abatement turns on factual verification of declarations and documents; matter remitted for fresh adjudication.

Eligibility for 75% abatement on goods transport agency services under Notification No. 32/2004-ST depended on compliance with the notification conditions and the supporting declarations obtained from transporters. The Tribunal noted that the legal position on the benefit was settled, but the lower authority had not properly verified the documents and declarations produced by the appellant. Because entitlement turned on factual examination of the evidence, the matter was remitted to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after verification and after giving both sides a reasonable opportunity to adduce evidence.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to 75% abatement on taxable value for goods transport agency services under Notification No. 32/2004-ST, and whether the matter required verification of the declarations and documents filed before the lower authority.

Analysis: The claim for abatement turned on compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST and on the declarations obtained from the respective transporters. The Tribunal noted that the legal position on eligibility for the notification benefit had already been settled, but the factual verification of the documents and declarations produced by the appellant had not been properly undertaken by the lower authority. As the matter depended on examination of the supporting evidence, the issue required reconsideration by the original adjudicating authority after giving the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing and permitting both sides to produce evidence.

Conclusion: The appellant's claim was not finally rejected on merits. The matter was remitted to the original adjudicating authority for fresh decision after verification of the material.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the adjudication was set aside and the dispute was sent back for fresh consideration on the evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: Where eligibility for a notification-based tax abatement depends on factual verification of compliance documents, the proper course is remand for fresh adjudication after examining the evidence.

---