Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court deems yarn texturising as manufacturing under Income Tax Act, grants tax deductions</h1> <h3>Nirman Syntex Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax</h3> Nirman Syntex Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - TMI Issues:- Interpretation of whether the process of texturising yarn constitutes manufacturing for deduction under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act.Analysis:The judgment by the High Court of Gujarat involved two appeals arising from a common judgment by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the same assessee but different Assessment Years. The central question in both appeals was whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the process of texturising yarn does not qualify as manufacturing or producing an article for claiming deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act.During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel argued that previous Supreme Court decisions supported the view that texturising partially oriented yarn constitutes manufacturing under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. Specifically, reference was made to the cases of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Emptee Poly-Yarn P. Ltd. and Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Yashasvi Yarn Ltd. The revenue's counsel, on the other hand, could not provide any contradictory decisions to challenge this interpretation.After considering the arguments and relying on the Supreme Court precedents mentioned, the High Court held in favor of the assessee. The court concluded that the process of twisting and texturising partially oriented yarn does amount to manufacturing under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the assessee was deemed eligible for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act.In the final decision, the High Court allowed the Tax Appeals in favor of the assessee, without imposing any costs. The judgment emphasized the application of established legal principles and Supreme Court interpretations to determine the eligibility of the assessee for tax deductions based on the manufacturing process of texturising yarn.