TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rulings on lease rentals, TDS disallowance, and rental income classification.</h1> <h3>Egwood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle 2(2) Hyderabad</h3> Egwood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle 2(2) Hyderabad - TMI Issues involved:1. Treatment of lease rentals under different heads of income.2. Disallowance of lease rentals for non-deduction of TDS.3. Classification of rental income from property as business income or income from house property.4. Treatment of income from letting out furniture and fixtures as business income.Issue 1: Treatment of lease rentals under different heads of income:The cross-appeals filed by the Revenue and Assessee were against the Order of the CIT(A)-III for the assessment year 2007-2008. The Assessing Officer held that the lease rentals for Racking Systems should be taxed under 'Income from House Property' as the income was credited to the profit and loss account. The A.O. also mentioned the possibility of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The CIT(A) confirmed this decision, but the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal based on the precedent set in similar cases where the absence of a claim in the profit and loss account led to the disallowance being set aside.Issue 2: Disallowance of lease rentals for non-deduction of TDS:The Assessing Officer disallowed the lease rentals paid to M/s. Rack India Pvt. Ltd. for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia). The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee based on the absence of a claim in the profit and loss account, following previous decisions where such disallowances were set aside.Issue 3: Classification of rental income from property as business income or income from house property:The Revenue raised grounds challenging the treatment of rental income from a warehouse/godown as 'income from business' instead of 'income from house property'. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where a similar situation was considered, and it was held that income derived from letting out a warehouse/godown for commercial purposes should be treated as 'income from business'. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal based on this precedent.Issue 4: Treatment of income from letting out furniture and fixtures as business income:The Revenue appealed against the treatment of income from letting out furniture & fixtures and generator as business income instead of income from other sources. The Tribunal held that since the assessee was engaged in the business of letting out warehouse/godown for commercial purposes, the income from furniture & fixtures and generator should also be treated as business income. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal based on this reasoning.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the treatment of lease rentals and dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning the classification of rental income and income from letting out furniture and fixtures. The judgments were based on the specific circumstances of each issue and previous legal precedents.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
