Court grants waiver of pre-deposit & penalty under Section 11AC citing precedents. Recovery stayed during appeal.

The court granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT credit and penalty under Section 11AC. Relying on precedents like Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. and M/s Essar Steel India Ltd., the judge found that the applicants had established a prima facie case for a total waiver of pre-deposit. Recovery of dues adjudged was waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. The judgment recognized the applicability of the definition of input service to the construction-related activities of the applicants, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal interpretations and previous Tribunal rulings.

---

---

Issues: Application for waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT credit and penalty under Section 11AC.

Analysis:
1. The applicant, a manufacturer of MS channel and angles, sought waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT credit and penalty under Section 11AC. The dispute arose when the department denied CENVAT credit on input service availed by the applicant related to the construction of rooms/colony for workers. The applicant contended that the definition of input service, as interpreted by the Hon'ble High Court in previous cases, includes construction activities. They cited the judgments in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd., Coca Cola India, and ABB Ltd. to support their claim.

2. The presiding judge, after hearing both sides, referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. case, which recognized construction and maintenance of township as falling within the scope of the definition of input service. Additionally, the Tribunal's decision in the case of M/s Essar Steel India Ltd. was cited, where unconditional stay was granted on similar grounds. Consequently, the judge found that the applicants had established a prima facie case for a total waiver of pre-deposit. Therefore, the requirement of pre-deposit of dues adjudged was waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency.

3. The judgment concluded by allowing the stay petition, indicating that the applicants successfully demonstrated the applicability of the definition of input service to their construction-related activities, as per the precedents cited. The decision to grant a waiver of pre-deposit and stay recovery during the appeal process was based on the established legal interpretations and previous Tribunal rulings, ensuring fairness and adherence to the law in the resolution of the dispute.

---