TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, in valuing the assessee's shares, the amount representing advance income-tax paid by the company was required to be deducted from the provision for taxation under rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules read with Explanation II(ii)(e); (ii) Whether the value of National Defence Certificates held by the assessee was exempt under section 5(1) read with section 5(1A) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Issue (i): Whether, in valuing the assessee's shares, the amount representing advance income-tax paid by the company was required to be deducted from the provision for taxation under rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules read with Explanation II(ii)(e).
Analysis: The issue was covered by an earlier decision of the Court on the interpretation of rule ID and the relevant explanation governing valuation of shares.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the value of National Defence Certificates held by the assessee was exempt under section 5(1) read with section 5(1A) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The issue was covered by an earlier decision of the Court construing the exemption provisions under section 5.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered in favour of the Revenue, leaving no relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the controlling precedent has already interpreted the valuation and exemption provisions, the reference must be answered consistently with that binding interpretation.
TaxTMI 
