TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Mumbai: Assessee's appeal allowed on disallowance of payments. Revenue appeal dismissed on recovery commission.</h1> <h3>M/s. Prithvi Prakashan (P) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax</h3> M/s. Prithvi Prakashan (P) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of payment to Media World Enterprises for calendars and professional charges.2. Disallowance of recovery commission paid to Media Experts Private Limited.Issue 1: Disallowance of payment to Media World Enterprises for calendars and professional charges:The appeals were filed against the order of CIT (A) for the assessment year 2007-2008. The first ground raised by the assessee was regarding the disallowance of payments made to Media World Enterprises for calendars and professional charges. The Tribunal referred to a similar issue in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2005-2006, where relief was granted based on the satisfactory explanation provided by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the disallowance was not justified as the payment was for advertisement in calendars and the services rendered were essential for the business. Considering the settled nature of the issue and the commonality with the assessment year 2005-2006, the Tribunal allowed the ground raised by the assessee for the assessment year 2007-2008.Issue 2: Disallowance of recovery commission paid to Media Experts Private Limited:The second issue pertained to the disallowance of recovery commission paid to Media Experts Private Limited (MEPL). The AO disallowed the amount for lack of evidence of services rendered. The Tribunal, after considering a similar issue for the assessment year 2005-2006, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) findings that MEPL had indeed provided services related to recovery, marketing, billing, and collection of advertisements. The Tribunal emphasized the long-standing arrangement between the assessee and MEPL, where payments were made for genuine services. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds for disallowance, highlighting the commercial expediency and reasonableness of the expenditure incurred. As the facts and additions confirmed by the CIT (A) were identical, the Tribunal dismissed the grounds raised by the Revenue for the assessment year 2007-2008.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the disallowance of payments to Media World Enterprises and professional charges, as well as dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning the disallowance of recovery commission paid to Media Experts Private Limited for the assessment year 2007-2008.
TaxTMI 