Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the Thoraipakkam and Ranipet units as running undertakings attracted Explanation 3 to Section 2(r) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 so as to bring the sale consideration into turnover and sustain the levy of penalty.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the parties intended transfer of the two units as going concerns, with all essential assets, liabilities, employees, contracts, licences, plant, machinery, and intangibles connected with those units. The mere separate valuation of immovable and movable assets did not alter the substance of the transaction. A sale of a business unit as a whole stands on a different footing from a sale of stock-in-trade or piecemeal assets, and the cessation of business in those units supported the claim that the transaction was a transfer of business undertakings rather than a taxable sale of goods.
Conclusion: Explanation 3 to Section 2(r) was not attracted, the sale consideration was not includible in turnover, and the penalty could not survive.