Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of the earlier Tribunal decision and the DGFT policy circular.
Analysis: The dispute concerned cenvat credit taken on duty-paid raw materials supplied against invalidated advance licences. The Tribunal noted that the same issue had already been decided in favour of the assessee in an earlier matter, where it was held that the relevant notification and connected rules did not require the goods to be cleared necessarily without payment of duty only. It further found that the revenue-neutrality aspect remained intact, since the supplier had paid duty and the recipient had taken credit of that duty. The policy circular relied upon by the adjudicating authority was held not to govern the specific question of availment of credit on duty-paid supplies, and therefore did not displace the earlier Tribunal view.
Conclusion: The appellants were held to have established a prima facie case for unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeals.