1989 (1) TMI 39 - HC - Income Tax

Public charitable trust granted tax exemption for business income supporting education and aid

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant exemption to the public charitable trust, ruling that the income derived from the business ... Charitable Trust, Exemptions Issues:Exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act for income derived from a public charitable trust carrying on business activities.Analysis:The judgment concerns a public charitable trust, the assessee, engaged in various activities, including running a business named Krishna Tent House. The Income-tax Officer granted exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act initially. However, assessments were later reopened for the years 1972-73 to 1975-76 under section 147(b) due to income earned from the business. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the exemption, leading to an appeal process. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal eventually granted relief to the assessee, exempting the income of the firm based on Supreme Court decisions in relevant cases like Dharmadeepti v. CIT and Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association.The Tribunal referred a common question to the High Court regarding the entitlement of the assessee to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act. The High Court analyzed the evolution of legal precedents, noting the conflicting views in earlier cases such as Indian Chamber of Commerce v. CIT and Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT. The High Court highlighted the Constitution Bench decision in Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association case, which clarified that if the primary purpose of the assessee is public utility for promotion of commerce and trade, exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Act is permissible.The High Court further examined the objectives of the trust, emphasizing that the business activities of the tent house were carried out solely for the trust's charitable purposes, primarily focused on providing education and assistance to the poor and deserving individuals. The Court concluded that since the business was conducted to support charitable activities like education and aid to the needy, it fell within the scope of section 11(1)(a) of the Act. Therefore, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to grant exemption to the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee with no order as to costs.