Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether edible grade coconut oil cleared in packs of 200 ml and below was classifiable under Chapter 15 of the Central Excise Tariff or under Chapter 33 as preparation for use on the hair.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the smaller pack size by itself changed the character of the product. The product descriptions on the labels indicated that the goods were premium edible oil and edible grade coconut oil. There was no evidence that the composition of the coconut oil in smaller packs differed from the oil cleared in larger packs, which was accepted as falling under Chapter 15. The earlier tribunal view, which had considered the Board circular and held that edible grade coconut oil repacked in smaller sachets remained classifiable under Chapter 15, was found fully applicable to the present facts.
Conclusion: Edible grade coconut oil packed in 200 ml and below was not classifiable under Chapter 33 as preparation for hair. It was classifiable under Chapter 15, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere packing of edible coconut oil in smaller quantities does not alter its tariff classification when the product remains represented and sold as edible grade coconut oil and no contrary evidence shows a different composition or use.