Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on service tax paid on group insurance, mediclaim and life insurance for employees was admissible, and whether the authorities could deny credit on the basis of a factual allegation not made in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The show cause notice alleged only that credit had been taken on insurance services for employees and contained no allegation that the insurance cover extended to family members. An adjudicating authority and the first appellate authority cannot travel beyond the notice and enlarge the case on a ground not pleaded therein. On the facts alleged in the notice, the employee insurance services were treated as connected with the manufacturing activity, especially in view of the statutory requirement to insure employees under the Employees State Insurance Act and the applicability of the same to the appellant.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable; the assessee succeeded on the issue.