Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act is required to be imposed at a minimum of five thousand rupees, or whether the provision merely prescribes an upper limit.
Analysis: The expression "not exceeding ... or five thousand rupees whichever is greater" was construed as fixing the maximum penalty that may be imposed, not a mandatory minimum. The wording does not create any floor of five thousand rupees. On the facts, the department's contention that the penalty had to be enhanced to five thousand rupees was found to be unsupported by the language of the provision.
Conclusion: Section 112(a) does not prescribe a minimum penalty of five thousand rupees; the penalty may be imposed at any amount up to the statutory ceiling. The departmental appeal failed.