Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to direct the appellate authority to decide the stay applications in the pending appeals within a fixed time and protect the petitioner from recovery proceedings until such decision.
Analysis: The petition challenged the continued pendency of the stay applications in appeals relating to assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 while recovery was being pressed. The Court noted that the petitioner sought early consideration of the stay requests and that the appellate authority was expected to exercise the power to decide such applications with due expedition. The Court found the cited authorities inapplicable to the commercial tax context and, in view of the recovery being pursued, considered it to issue a limited direction for prompt disposal of the stay applications.
Conclusion: The Court directed the Additional Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the stay applications in the pending appeals within three working days from production of a certified copy of the order.