Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal: Service income in India not excluded by 90% under Section 80HHE</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ACIT. Versus M/s ROBERT BOSCH (INDIA) LTD</h3> COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ACIT. Versus M/s ROBERT BOSCH (INDIA) LTD - TMI Issues Involved:1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the service income related to technical services rendered by the assessee-Company in India should not be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:1. Tribunal's Justification on Service Income and Section 80HHE:The central issue was whether the service income earned by the assessee-Company from technical services rendered in India should be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the service income should not be excluded by 90%, as it formed an integral part of the business income and was not covered by Explanation (d) of Section 80HHE.2. Assessee's Business and Claim under Section 80HHE:The assessee was engaged in computer software exports, domestic sales, technical services in and outside India, and manufacturing and sale of fuel injection pumps. For the assessment years in question, the assessee claimed deductions under Section 80HHE. The Assessing Officer excluded 90% of the service income from the profits of the business, stating it was generated from services rendered in India and did not qualify under Section 80HHE.3. Appellate Authority's Reversal of Assessing Officer's Order:The Appellate Authority reversed the Assessing Officer's decision, noting that the service income was an integral part of the business income and not covered by Explanation (d) of Section 80HHE. The AA directed the Assessing Officer not to exclude 90% of the service income while allowing relief under Section 80HHE.4. Tribunal's Confirmation of Appellate Authority's Order:The Tribunal confirmed the AA's order, agreeing that there was no justification to exclude 90% of the service income. The service income was considered part of the business profits and not in the nature of brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges.5. Revenue's Argument Based on Supreme Court Judgment:The revenue argued, based on the Supreme Court's judgment in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. K. RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR, that 90% of receipts like brokerage, commission, interest, rent, charges, or any other receipt of a similar nature should be excluded from business profits as they have no nexus with exports. The revenue contended that the service income was independent and unrelated to export activities, and thus should be excluded by 90%.6. Assessee's Counter-Argument:The assessee argued that the service income was an integral part of its business and did not fall within the purview of Clause (d) (1) of the explanation to Section 80HHE. The assessee emphasized that the service income was not similar to brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges, and excluding it would render the formula for determining eligible profits under Section 80HHE(3) redundant.7. Court's Analysis of Precedents and Explanation (d):The court analyzed judgments from the Supreme Court and High Courts, including the Supreme Court's ruling in Ravindranathan Nair and the Bombay High Court's decision in PFIZER LIMITED. The court noted that receipts like brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges are independent incomes unrelated to export turnover and should be excluded by 90% to avoid distortion of export profits.8. Court's Conclusion on Service Income:The court concluded that the service income earned by the assessee from rendering services in India did not fall within the category of receipts similar to brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges. Therefore, it should not be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE.Judgment:The court answered the question in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, stating that the service income should not be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with no costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found