Goods transport agency abatement: substantial compliance and supporting evidence justified waiver of predeposit and remand on merits.

A goods transport agency declaration in the consignment note was treated as sufficient for availing service tax abatement, and the benefit was not confined to that form alone where other evidence established entitlement. On the facts, the declarations and supporting material showed substantial compliance, giving the appellant a prima facie case for waiver of the full predeposit. As the first appellate authority had rejected the matter for non-compliance without examining the merits, the appeal was directed to be heard without further deposit and remanded for fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether consolidated declarations by the goods transport agency could be accepted for availing abatement under the service tax notifications, and whether the appeal should be remanded for decision on merits without insisting on further predeposit.

Analysis: The relevant circular clarified that a declaration by the goods transport agency in the consignment note may suffice for availing abatement. The court applied the view that such declaration was not mandatory in an exclusive sense and that other evidence could be considered to establish entitlement to the benefit. Relying on the circular and the High Court decision cited before it, the Tribunal held that the declarations and supporting material disclosed substantial compliance and that the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of the entire amount of dues. Since the first appellate authority had dismissed the appeal for non-compliance without hearing the matter on merits, interference was warranted.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to have the appeal heard on merits without any further deposit, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration.

---