Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a case where Cenvat credit on capital goods was taken along with depreciation on the duty element under the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: Rule 4(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules disallows credit on the portion of the value of capital goods representing duty where depreciation is claimed under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The record showed that depreciation was claimed on the duty element and Cenvat credit of the same amount was also availed during the relevant period. The amount was not reversed in the same financial year and the appellant could not produce revised income-tax returns to support its case. In these circumstances, the appellant was found not to have made out a strong prima facie case for complete waiver.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the duty amount, and recovery of the balance was stayed on compliance.