Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The materials on record showed that a portion of the MS items on which CENVAT credit had been taken was used for construction purposes, which did not justify full waiver at the interim stage. At the same time, the dispute regarding the use of the remaining materials in plant components such as storage tanks, boiler, chimney and pollution control equipment required consideration at the appeal hearing.
Conclusion: The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 20,00,000, and upon such deposit the balance pre-deposit stood waived and recovery of the balance dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only in part, with conditional waiver of the remaining pre-deposit after a further deposit and protection against recovery of the balance during appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the record shows prima facie use of credit-availing materials for construction purposes, complete waiver of pre-deposit is not warranted, though conditional waiver and stay may be granted pending appeal.