Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit in respect of duty and penalty arising from classification of water cooled cables.
Analysis: The appellant's goods were water cooled cables claimed to be used exclusively with electric induction furnaces. The Tribunal noted that an earlier decision had already considered water cooled cables with identical use and had held them classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 8544.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. In view of that precedent, the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for complete waiver of the duty and penalty demanded, though partial relief could be granted on deposit of a portion of the duty amount.
Conclusion: The request for total waiver was rejected and the appellant was directed to deposit 25% of the duty amount, with the balance stayed on compliance.