Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported telegraphic message was classifiable as a printed or handwritten letter under Customs Tariff Item 49021010 or as a collection or collector's piece of historical interest under Customs Tariff Item 97050090, and whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The expression "historical interest" is not defined in the Customs Act, the Customs Tariff or the Import Policy. The fact that the item was not an antiquity under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 did not prevent it from being a collector's piece of historical interest. Heading 9705 covers collections and collector's pieces of historical interest, while antiquities fall under Heading 9706. On the facts, the message commanded value only because of its historical significance, and the classification adopted by the lower authority was found to be correct. Once the goods were classifiable under the restricted tariff item and imported without licence, confiscation and penalty followed, and the amounts imposed were held reasonable.
Conclusion: The item was correctly classified under Customs Tariff Item 97050090. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 were upheld.