Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit was admissible on partly finished screen printing machines received in the factory and used for further manufacture of electrically operated screen printing machines, and whether the activity amounted to manufacture so as to treat the goods as inputs.
Analysis: Goods which are final products in the hands of one person may become inputs in the hands of another person if they are subjected to further manufacturing process. Rule 57A did not permit credit on machinery as such, but Rule 57B(2) carved out an exception where such machines, machinery or equipment were used as component parts in the manufacture of final products. The process undertaken by the appellant was held to amount to manufacture under Section Note 6 of Section XVI, and the purchased machines were used as inputs in the further manufacture of the final product.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The lower authorities' orders were set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods received in a factory are subjected to further manufacturing so that they become component parts in the manufacture of a new final product, they may qualify as inputs for credit purposes, and the activity may constitute manufacture.