TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision on expense disallowance for electricity & furnace oil</h1> <h3>Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax Versus M/s. Maha Shiv Shakti Steel Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax Versus M/s. Maha Shiv Shakti Steel Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:Disallowance of 25% of expenses towards electricity and furnace oil expenditure on ad-hoc basis by the AO.Analysis:The appeals were filed by Revenue against the orders of CIT(A)-VII, Hyderabad, regarding the disallowance of 25% of expenses towards electricity and furnace oil expenditure for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09. The Revenue contended that the Assessee failed to furnish evidence for the expenses and that the disallowance should have been sustained. The Assessee, a steel re-rolling products manufacturer, argued that the AO did not provide an opportunity to explain, and no incriminating material was found during a search & seizure operation. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowances made by the AO after examining the facts and submissions. The percentage of expenditure on electricity and furnace oil in relation to turnover was found to be reasonable, and no adverse information was available to support the disallowance.The CIT(A) emphasized that assessments on ad-hoc disallowance cannot be made solely on legal principles but must also consider facts. The Assessee had paid electricity charges to APCPDCL and APGPCL, and furnace oil was purchased from HPCL and BPCL through account payee cheques. The CIT(A) concluded that there was no basis for the disallowance, especially since payments were traceable and reasonable. The AO had completed assessments based on a search & seizure operation without any evidence of production inflation or suppression by the Assessee. The Revenue failed to provide any substantial support for the AO's order, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.In summary, the ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowances of 25% of expenses towards electricity and furnace oil expenditure for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2008-09. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed due to the lack of evidence supporting the AO's disallowance and the reasonable nature of the Assessee's expenditure on essential business costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
