Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand relating to denial of CENVAT credit on service tax paid by the job worker.
Analysis: The job worker had discharged service tax, was registered with the department, and had issued invoices against which consideration had been paid. In the absence of any action against the job worker or any finding that the tax paid by him was not service tax, the denial of credit to the appellant was found to be prima facie unsustainable. The exemption available to the job worker under Notification No. 8/2005-ST did not, at this stage, justify denial of credit to the appellant.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery till disposal of the appeal.