Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether sales of oil seeds made to a dealer holding a recognition certificate against Form 3-B were liable to tax at the reduced rate of 2% under clause (3) of the notification dated 29 August 1987 despite supersession of earlier notifications under Section 4-B of the Trade Tax Act; (ii) Whether exemption from tax on sales made against Form 3-C(1) was governed by Section 3-D(7) of the Trade Tax Act and unaffected by the said notification.
Issue (i): Whether sales of oil seeds made to a dealer holding a recognition certificate against Form 3-B were liable to tax at the reduced rate of 2% under clause (3) of the notification dated 29 August 1987 despite supersession of earlier notifications under Section 4-B of the Trade Tax Act.
Analysis: Clause (3) of the notification dated 29 August 1987 specifically provided that sales to, or purchases by, a dealer holding a recognition certificate of goods covered by the relevant annexure and used as raw material for manufacture of notified goods would attract tax at 2%. The earlier notifications having been superseded did not exclude the operation of this clause. The Tribunal had overlooked this part of the notification while denying the reduced rate.
Conclusion: The assessee's claim to the reduced rate of tax on Form 3-B sales required reconsideration under clause (3) of the notification dated 29 August 1987.
Issue (ii): Whether exemption from tax on sales made against Form 3-C(1) was governed by Section 3-D(7) of the Trade Tax Act and unaffected by the said notification.
Analysis: The exemption claimed on Form 3-C(1) sales arose under Section 3-D(7) of the Trade Tax Act. The notification dated 29 August 1987 had no application to dilute or displace that statutory exemption. The Tribunal failed to examine the claim on that footing.
Conclusion: The exemption claim under Section 3-D(7) also had to be examined afresh.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter restored for fresh adjudication of the assessee's claims.