Extended limitation for tax suppression, with conditional stay granted on pre-deposit of service tax and interest.

Non-disclosure of goods transport agency payments and non-payment of service tax, despite audit objections and notice, led the Tribunal to hold that the extended period of limitation was not prima facie open to challenge on the alleged facts of suppression and intent to evade. Conditional interim protection was nevertheless granted: complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused, but stay of further proceedings was allowed on deposit of service tax and interest within the stipulated time, with penalties left for final consideration. The interim application was thus allowed in part, and the appeal remained for final hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the invocation of the extended period of limitation was prima facie justified on the facts alleged; (ii) Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings should be granted, and on what terms.

Issue (i): Whether the invocation of the extended period of limitation was prima facie justified on the facts alleged.

Analysis: The demand arose from non-disclosure of goods transport agency payments and non-payment of service tax despite audit objections and subsequent notice. The allegations specifically proceeded on failure to disclose taxable transactions and an intent to evade tax. On that factual matrix, the plea that the extended period could not be invoked did not find prima facie acceptance at this stage.

Conclusion: The challenge to the invocation of the extended period of limitation was not accepted prima facie.

Issue (ii): Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings should be granted, and on what terms.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the service recipient was, in the relevant period, liable to remit service tax on the goods transport agency services and could seek refund thereafter. It also observed that the question of penalties required consideration at the final hearing. Accordingly, complete waiver was declined, but conditional interim protection was considered appropriate.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings were granted conditionally, subject to deposit of the service tax and interest within the stipulated time, excluding the penalties.

Final Conclusion: The interim application was allowed in part by granting conditional stay, while the appeal was left for final hearing.

---