Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court upholds Tribunal decision to remand matter for re-examination under amended provisions</h1> <h3>THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(5) Versus M/s KARNATAKA STATE BEVERAGES CORPN. LTD.</h3> THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(5) Versus M/s KARNATAKA STATE BEVERAGES CORPN. LTD. - TMI Issues:1. Revision of order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding deduction of privilege fee as revenue expenditure.2. Legitimacy of privilege fee payment in relation to the Karnataka Excise Act.Analysis:1. The appeal before the Karnataka High Court involved a dispute regarding the deduction of privilege fee paid by the assessee company to the State Government as revenue expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner, exercising revisional powers under section 263 of the Act, had revised the order disallowing the deduction. The Tribunal, on appeal, considered the amendment to section 24 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, which was made retrospectively after the Commissioner's order. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for re-examination in light of this amendment.2. The Tribunal's decision to remand the matter was challenged in the present appeal by the Revenue. However, the High Court declined to interfere at that stage, noting that all aspects of the matter were left open by the Tribunal for the Commissioner to re-examine and pass fresh orders. The Court emphasized that the Revenue could raise legal questions at a later stage if necessary. As a result, the High Court dismissed the appeal, allowing the Commissioner to re-evaluate the issue in accordance with the amended provisions of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.