Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of Cenvat credit availed on angle, sheet, section, flat and bar.
Analysis: The goods in question were angle, sheet, section, flat and bar, which were held to fall under Chapters 72 and 73 of the tariff. On that basis, they did not fall within the category of capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. As the appellant had not shown a strong prima facie case for full waiver, only partial relief was considered justified.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the duty as pre-deposit, and on compliance, recovery of the balance amount was stayed till disposal of the appeal.