Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether complete waiver of pre-deposit could be granted in the stay application, and whether recovery of the balance demand should be stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The appellant had been called upon to pay duty, interest and penalty on the ground of ineligible benefit under Notification No. 10/97-CE. The supplied goods to several research and educational institutions appeared prima facie to be covered by the notification, but the supplies to certain other entities raised a debatable question on applicability. In view of the mixed factual position, complete waiver of pre-deposit was not justified, though conditional relief could be granted to protect the appellant during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but a reduced pre-deposit was directed and the balance recovery was stayed on compliance, in favour of the appellant only to that limited extent.