Application for Rectification of Order Dismissed as Not Constituting Apparent Error

The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order, regarding entitlement for SSI exemption. The Tribunal found that the issue raised did not constitute an error apparent on the face of the record and delving into it would require reexamining the entire matter, beyond its review authority. Therefore, the application was deemed devoid of merit and was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Rectification of mistake in the order regarding entitlement for SSI exemption.

Analysis:
The appellant filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order passed by the Tribunal dated 01.12.2010. The appellant contended that they were entitled to SSI exemption from 01.04.1987 onwards, a legal point already settled in separate proceedings. The ld. Authorized Representative argued that the Tribunal failed to consider this aspect, which was crucial to their case. On the other hand, the Revenue's representative argued that the appeal was heard extensively, and the order was dictated in the presence of both parties. They contended that the issue raised by the appellant did not constitute an error apparent on the face of the record but rather delved into the core of the matter. The Revenue cited a Supreme Court decision to support their position that the Tribunal lacked the power to review its own order.

Upon hearing both sides and examining the records, the Tribunal noted that the order was dictated in open court after considering arguments from both parties. The Tribunal found that revisiting the point raised by the appellant would essentially require reexamining the entire matter, which fell outside the scope of the Tribunal's authority to review its own order. The Tribunal concluded that the issue raised did not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record and thus could not be rectified. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for rectification of mistake, deeming it devoid of merit. The decision was pronounced in open court, bringing the matter to a close.

---