Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final order required rectification of technical mistakes in the portion dealing with duty demand, confiscation and penalty, and whether the operative part of the order had to be modified accordingly.
Analysis: The mistakes pointed out were accepted as technical in nature and not affecting the merits of the controversy. The operative portion was corrected to reflect that the demand of duty of Rs. 12,80,542.50 was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh computation of clearances. The confiscation relating to 36 airconditioners, 4 fans and 4 deep freezers with redemption fine was also corrected and set aside, while the demand of Rs. 58,44,825 with penalty for clandestine removal and the confiscation of 24 airconditioners seized from the residential premises, along with duty and penalty under Rule 173Q, were maintained.
Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed and the final order was modified in the terms recorded, resulting in partial relief to both sides with the Revenue securing correction of the operative order.