Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and whether a conditional stay should be granted in the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute was examined at the interim stage on limitation and merits. The demand relating to alleged excess utilisation of CENVAT credit was found to disclose a prima facie case for the appellant on limitation, since ST-3 returns had been filed regularly showing credit taken and utilised. On the storage and warehousing demand, the claimed exemption for storage of soya bean meal was not accepted prima facie because soya bean meal was treated as a residue of processing and not as agricultural produce under the exemption notification. The invoices also indicated stock management charges based on quantity of soya bean meal rather than mere rent for space, supporting the view that the appellant had not established a strong prima facie case on merits. In these circumstances, the appellant was required to be put to terms, and the offer of a reduced pre-deposit was accepted.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 5,00,000 within six weeks, and on such deposit the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.