Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal rules toll charges for road construction not taxable under service tax laws</h1> <h3>MMK Toll Road (P.) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax-II, Mumbai</h3> MMK Toll Road (P.) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax-II, Mumbai - 2013 (30) S.T.R. 190 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:Common issue of whether toll charges collected by the appellants for construction of roads fall under 'Business Auxiliary Services' for service tax purposes.Analysis:The judgment involves seven appeals and stay applications with a common issue. The appellants were awarded contracts for road construction on a Build, Operate, and Transfer (BOT) basis by various government entities. The Revenue claimed that toll charges collected under these contracts constitute 'Business Auxiliary Services' subject to service tax. The appellants argued that road construction services are not taxable under the Finance Act, specifically excluded from service tax levy. They highlighted exemptions for maintenance and repair services as well. The Revenue's position was reiterated by the Additional Commissioner, emphasizing the impugned orders.Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found that road construction services are excluded from service tax under various categories like 'Commercial and Industrial Construction Service' and 'Works Contract Service.' Additionally, maintenance and repair services were exempted with retrospective effect. The appellants' collection of toll charges was deemed for their own benefit to cover construction costs, not rendering 'Business Auxiliary Services' for others. A circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs clarified that tolls paid by road users, including those under the BOT model, are not subject to service tax unless collected by an independent entity on behalf of the concessionaire.Based on the arguments and the circular, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of the dues adjudged and stayed recovery during the appeals' pendency. Due to substantial revenue involved, the Tribunal scheduled all appeals for final disposal on a specific date and directed related appeals to be tagged together for efficiency in addressing the identical issue.