Appellant must deposit 25% service tax within 8 weeks to challenge taxable value inclusion.

The Tribunal directed the appellant, a clearing and forwarding agent, to deposit 25% of the service tax within eight weeks, with the balance amount waived and recovery stayed during the appeal regarding the inclusion of re-imbursable expenses in the taxable value. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal. The decision aimed to balance financial hardship with revenue interests, emphasizing the consistent application of legal principles and precedent in tax matters.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty under Section 78 and other provisions of Finance Act, 1994.
2. Inclusion of re-imbursable expenses like godown rent and loading/unloading charges in the gross taxable value for clearing and forwarding agent services.

Analysis:
1. The appellant, engaged in providing clearing and forwarding agent services, sought waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties totaling Rs.19,13,727 imposed for discrepancies between gross taxable value in ST-3 Returns and balance-sheet. The consultant argued that the difference pertained to re-imbursable expenses from their Principal, M/s Lafarge India Ltd., and should not be included in taxable value. Citing a Tribunal decision and financial crisis due to factory closure, the appellant requested relief.

2. The Revenue contended that expenses like godown rent and loading/unloading charges are integral to clearing and forwarding services, as per the agreement with M/s Lafarge India Ltd. Referring to Tribunal judgments in similar cases, the Revenue argued for pre-deposit. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal considered the issue of including re-imbursable expenses in taxable value. Relying on past decisions, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 25% of the service tax within eight weeks, with the balance amount waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal.

This judgment addresses the crucial issue of whether re-imbursable expenses should be included in the taxable value for clearing and forwarding agent services. The Tribunal balanced the financial hardship faced by the appellant with the interest of revenue, ultimately ordering a partial deposit to proceed with the appeal process. The decision underscores the importance of consistent application of legal principles and precedent while considering financial implications and fairness in tax matters.

---