Tribunal grants stay petition for waiver of service tax demand, ensuring fair hearing and due process.

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax demand, interest, and penalties under Sections 76 & 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the differential service tax liability under mandap keeper service. The appellant had already deposited a significant amount, which the Tribunal deemed adequate for a fair hearing and disposal of the appeal on its merits. Consequently, the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the remaining balance amounts was granted, and recovery was stayed until the final disposal of the appeal, ensuring fairness and due process in the adjudication of the case.

---

---

Issues involved: Stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax demand, interest, and penalties under Sections 76 & 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for differential service tax liability under mandap keeper service.

Analysis:

1. Stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit: The appellant filed a stay petition seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Rs.7,76,572/- confirmed as demand of service tax, interest, and penalties under Sections 76 & 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The issue revolved around the differential service tax liability under the category of mandap keeper services. The appellant offered a package to corporate clients for holding conferences, with the department contending that room rent and food charges could be covered under mandap keeper service.

2. Submission by the appellant: The appellant's chartered accountant argued that the services' taxability needed consideration on merits. It was highlighted that the appellant had already deposited Rs.4,50,000/- in support of their case, evidenced by a copy of the government collection account challan. This deposit was deemed sufficient by the appellant to enable a fair hearing and disposal of the appeal on its merits.

3. Decision and rationale: After hearing the arguments and examining the records, the Tribunal found the issue to be arguable and debatable. The Tribunal concluded that the amount already deposited by the appellant was adequate to proceed with the appeal's hearing and disposal on merits. Consequently, the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the remaining balance amounts was allowed, and recovery thereof was stayed until the appeal's final disposal. This decision was crucial in ensuring fairness and due process in the adjudication of the appellant's case.

This detailed analysis outlines the key aspects of the judgment, including the nature of the petition, arguments presented, and the Tribunal's decision regarding the waiver of pre-deposit in the context of the differential service tax liability under mandap keeper services.

---