Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount reversed by the assessee under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and recovered from buyers of exempted goods was liable to be deposited under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The assessee had cleared exempted goods after reversing 8% of the value under Rule 57CC in respect of common inputs used for dutiable and exempted products. The decisive question was whether the recovered amount remained with the assessee as an amount collected as excise duty. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling that where the amount reversed under Rule 57CC has already been passed on to the revenue through the credit mechanism and no amount remains retained by the assessee, Section 11D is not attracted. The Tribunal distinguished the contrary High Court decision relied on by the Revenue on the ground that it concerned different facts where the amount had been represented and collected as excise duty in a different context.
Conclusion: The amount reversed under Rule 57CC and recovered from buyers was not liable to be demanded again under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 11D applies only where an assessee retains amounts collected from buyers as representing excise duty and does not pass them on to the revenue; where the amount has already been reversed or paid over through the prescribed credit mechanism, no further demand under Section 11D lies.