Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in treating the assessee's liability for holiday wages and leave with wages as an ascertained liability deductible in computing income, and whether a question of law arose for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee claimed deduction for liability arising under the Bidi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim on the footing that no actual payment had been made. The Tribunal, however, treated the liability as ascertained and deductible. On these facts, the court found that the Tribunal's view gave rise to a question of law fit for reference under section 256(2).
Conclusion: The application was allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the question of law to the court.