Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of predeposit and stay against recovery in a service tax dispute involving claim of SSI exemption and the relevance of non-availment of CENVAT credit.
Analysis: The appellant had deposited a substantial part of the demand. The claim for SSI exemption required examination, and at the prima facie stage the question whether non-availment of CENVAT credit had to be proved was not treated as conclusive. The plea of bona fide belief was also found relevant for consideration. On the facts, the deposited amount was treated as sufficient for interim protection during pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: Waiver of predeposit of the balance dues was granted and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.