Mortgage by deposit of title-deeds needs no registration unless the written document itself creates rights or liabilities.

A mortgage by deposit of title-deeds is complete on delivery of the deeds with intent to create security, and does not require a registered instrument unless the parties execute a written document that itself creates or records rights and liabilities. On the facts found, no registration fee or stamp duty was payable before the charge could be entered in the revenue record. However, the territorial applicability of Section 58(f) had to be examined, because the record raised a live objection that the properties were in villages and not in a notified town. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration on that issue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds requires a registered instrument, registration fee, and stamp duty before a charge can be entered in the revenue record. (ii) Whether the High Court's direction for mutation based on mortgage by deposit of title-deeds could be sustained without examining whether the properties were situated in a town notified under Section 58(f) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

Issue (i): Whether a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds requires a registered instrument, registration fee, and stamp duty before a charge can be entered in the revenue record.

Analysis: Mortgage by deposit of title-deeds is a mode of mortgage recognised by Section 58(f) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and is complete on delivery of title deeds with intent to create security. Such a mortgage does not, by itself, require a registered instrument under Section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Registration is attracted only where the parties reduce the bargain to writing in a document that itself creates or records rights and liabilities as an integral part of the transaction. A mere memorandum evidencing a concluded deposit of title deeds does not require registration. In the facts found, no such instrument creating rights or liabilities was shown.

Conclusion: The charge could be entered in the revenue record without a registered mortgage instrument, and no registration fee or stamp duty was payable on the facts found; the appeal on this issue failed.

Issue (ii): Whether the High Court's direction for mutation based on mortgage by deposit of title-deeds could be sustained without examining whether the properties were situated in a town notified under Section 58(f) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

Analysis: The applicability of Section 58(f) depends on whether the immovable property is situated in a town specified by the State Government. The record showed a specific objection that the properties were in villages and not in the notified towns, and this question went to the root of the matter. The High Court had not examined this factual and legal aspect before directing mutation.

Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained on this aspect, and the matter required fresh consideration by the High Court.

Final Conclusion: The decision upheld the legal position that a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds does not, by itself, require registration, but one connected appeal was dismissed and the other was remitted for reconsideration on the issue of territorial applicability of Section 58(f).

Ratio Decidendi: A mortgage by deposit of title-deeds is complete upon delivery of the title deeds with intent to create security and does not require registration unless the parties execute a written document that itself forms part of the bargain and creates or records rights and liabilities.

---