Court Overturns Tax Authorities' Orders, Allows Petitioner's Bank Account Access with Restrictions. Stay on Recovery & Garnishee Notices.

The court set aside the orders of the Income Tax Officer and Addl. Director of Income Tax, directing the petitioner to file a stay application before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for prompt decision. Interim arrangements were made for the petitioner's bank accounts, with certain restrictions on withdrawals. Garnishee notices were stayed, and recovery was prohibited during the application's pendency and a specified period post an adverse order. Noncompliance with garnishee notices due to the court's order was clarified, and the CIT (Appeals) was authorized to issue consequential directions to the Income Tax Department.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order of Income Tax Officer and Addl. Director of Income Tax regarding stay against coercive recovery and garnishee notices.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a registered society, challenged orders refusing stay against coercive recovery and garnishee notices issued by the Income Tax Officer and Addl. Director of Income Tax. The petitioner had already filed an appeal against the assessment order. The petitioner's bank accounts were attached due to the alleged tax liability. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner had a strong case but was unable to carry out daily activities due to the attachment orders. The counsel contended that the authorities did not follow the principles set in KEC International Ltd. v/s. B.R.Balkrishnan (2001) 251 ITR 158. On the other hand, the revenue's counsel opposed the petition, stating that the authorities had considered the stay application and no interference was warranted.

The court considered the submissions and referred to the principles laid down in KEC International Ltd. case. It found that the authorities' orders were cryptic and did not adhere to the principles. The court set aside the orders and directed the petitioner to file a stay application before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for expeditious decision, preferably within three months. The court also allowed the CIT (Appeals) to take up the appeal for final disposal if deemed appropriate.

During the pendency of the stay application, the court made interim arrangements regarding the petitioner's bank accounts and fixed deposits. It prohibited withdrawal from certain accounts but allowed operations in others. The court stayed the garnishee notices and prohibited recovery during the pendency of the application and for a specified period after an adverse order. Noncompliance by banks with the garnishee notices due to the court's order was clarified. The CIT (Appeals) was empowered to issue consequential directions to the Income Tax Department based on their decision.

In conclusion, the writ petition was disposed of with the above interim arrangements and directions for the CIT (Appeals) to decide on the stay application and appeal promptly.

---